Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of experimental and conventional interventions

From: Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

 

Control Group

20’ SSP Group

40’ SSP Group

Variable

T0 (n=20)

T1 (n=19)

T2 (n=11)

T0 (n=24)

T1 (n=22)

T2 (n=11)

T0 (n=31)

T1 (n=26)

T2 (n=14)

FM

10.55 (±1.11)

12.16 (±1.14)

14.45 (±1.46)

8.89 (±1.19)

10.9 (±1.23)

13.82 (±1.55)

8.33 (±0.91)

10 (±0.97)

11.93 (±1.46)

FIM

53.65 (±3.83)

64.79 (±5.44)

79.3 (±9.85)

51.17 (±2.85)

62. 15 (±3.18)

75.92 (±6.84)

49.45 (±2.89)

61.08 (±4.2)

74.43 (±7.4)

FAC

0.3 (±0.1)

1 (±0.24)

2.3 (±0.52)

0.17 (±0.08)

0.73 (±0.18)

2 (±0.43)

0.35 (±0.09)

0.8 (±0.22)

1.93 (±0.53)

MAS

3.5 (±0.43)

3.97 (±0.46)

4.2 (±0.36)

4.26 (±0.5)

4.5 (±0.27)

4.95 (±0.54)

4.14 (±0.48)

4.68 (±0.46)

4.89 (±0.42)

TCT*

55.5 (±8.96)

63.83 (±9.15)

92.2 (±5.2)

45.79 (±8.52)

54.57 (±8.33)

60 (±12.64)

46.19 (7.94)

71.17 (±7.7)

97.4 (±2.6)

SBP Diff

4 (±2.04)

5.53 (±1.79)

0.91 (±2.11)

4.35 (±2.4)

8.42 (±1.95)

0.91 (±2.11)

8.79 (±2.75)

12.2 (±2.47)

-2. 43 (±1.03)

  1. Data are mean (standard error)
  2. 20’SSP 20/min Supported Standing Practice, 40’SSP 40/min Supported Standing Practice, FAC Functional Ambulation Categories, FIM Functional Independence Measure, FM Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke - motor domain, MAS Modified Ashworth Scale, SBP Diff difference in Systolic Blood Pressure between the supine and standing position, T0 baseline, T1 end of treatment, T2 follow-up (3 months), TCT Trunk Control Test
  3. aThe TCT was administered in a subsample (Control/20’ SS/40’ SSP: T0 = 12/14/16, T1 = 12/13/12, T2 = 5/7/5)