Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Effects of experimental and conventional interventions

From: Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

  Control Group 20’ SSP Group 40’ SSP Group
Variable T0 (n=20) T1 (n=19) T2 (n=11) T0 (n=24) T1 (n=22) T2 (n=11) T0 (n=31) T1 (n=26) T2 (n=14)
FM 10.55 (±1.11) 12.16 (±1.14) 14.45 (±1.46) 8.89 (±1.19) 10.9 (±1.23) 13.82 (±1.55) 8.33 (±0.91) 10 (±0.97) 11.93 (±1.46)
FIM 53.65 (±3.83) 64.79 (±5.44) 79.3 (±9.85) 51.17 (±2.85) 62. 15 (±3.18) 75.92 (±6.84) 49.45 (±2.89) 61.08 (±4.2) 74.43 (±7.4)
FAC 0.3 (±0.1) 1 (±0.24) 2.3 (±0.52) 0.17 (±0.08) 0.73 (±0.18) 2 (±0.43) 0.35 (±0.09) 0.8 (±0.22) 1.93 (±0.53)
MAS 3.5 (±0.43) 3.97 (±0.46) 4.2 (±0.36) 4.26 (±0.5) 4.5 (±0.27) 4.95 (±0.54) 4.14 (±0.48) 4.68 (±0.46) 4.89 (±0.42)
TCT* 55.5 (±8.96) 63.83 (±9.15) 92.2 (±5.2) 45.79 (±8.52) 54.57 (±8.33) 60 (±12.64) 46.19 (7.94) 71.17 (±7.7) 97.4 (±2.6)
SBP Diff 4 (±2.04) 5.53 (±1.79) 0.91 (±2.11) 4.35 (±2.4) 8.42 (±1.95) 0.91 (±2.11) 8.79 (±2.75) 12.2 (±2.47) -2. 43 (±1.03)
  1. Data are mean (standard error)
  2. 20’SSP 20/min Supported Standing Practice, 40’SSP 40/min Supported Standing Practice, FAC Functional Ambulation Categories, FIM Functional Independence Measure, FM Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke - motor domain, MAS Modified Ashworth Scale, SBP Diff difference in Systolic Blood Pressure between the supine and standing position, T0 baseline, T1 end of treatment, T2 follow-up (3 months), TCT Trunk Control Test
  3. aThe TCT was administered in a subsample (Control/20’ SS/40’ SSP: T0 = 12/14/16, T1 = 12/13/12, T2 = 5/7/5)