Skip to main content

Table 1 Assessment of methodological quality of the included studies using the COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments checklist. Where the psychometric properties were not included in the studies, the boxes are left blanks

From: Patient-reported outcome measures for non-specific neck pain validated in the Italian-language: a systematic review

Authors, year

Internal consistency

Reliability

Measurement error

Content validity

Structural validity

Hypotheses testing

Translation process

Responsiveness

Hains et al, 1998 [53]

Excellent

   

Good

Good

  

Stratford et al, 1999 [54]

Fair

Poor

Poor

 

Poor

Poor

 

Poor

Wheeler et al, 1999 [65]

Poor

  

Poor

Fair

Fair

  

Chok & Gomez, 2000 [26]

 

Poor

     

Poor

Ackelman & Lindgren, 2002 [27]

 

Poor

 

Poor

 

Poor

  

Bolton & Humphreys, 2002 [76]

Poor

Poor

Poor

  

Poor

  

Goolkasian et al, 2002 [73]

 

Poor

   

Poor

  

Wlodyka-Demaille et al, 2002 [28]

 

Poor

  

Fair

Fair

Poor

 

Bicer et al, 2004 [69]

Poor

    

Poor

Poor

 

Bolton, 2004 [80]

       

Poor

White et al, 2004 [81]

 

Fair

 

Poor

 

Fair

  

Wlodyka-Demaille et al, 2004 [75]

       

Poor

Lee et al, 2006 [29]

Poor

Poor

   

Poor

Poor

Poor

Vos et al, 2006 [30]

 

Fair

Fair

    

Poor

Gay et al, 2007 [59]

Poor

    

Poor

 

Poor

Kose et al, 2007 [31]

Poor

Fair

   

Poor

Poor

Poor

Mousavi et al, 2007 (NDI) [32]

Fair

Fair

 

Poor

  

Poor

 

Mousavi et al, 2007 (NPDS) [32]

Fair

Fair

 

Poor

Fair

 

Poor

 

Pool et al, 2007 [63]

  

Fair

    

Fair

Cleland et al, 2008 [60]

 

Fair

Fair

    

Fair

Kovacs et al, 2008 [82]

Poor

Poor

   

Poor

Poor

Poor

Monticone et al, 2008 [20]

Fair

Fair

  

Fair

Poor

Poor

 

Scherer et al, 2008 [67]

Excellent

   

Good

Good

Poor

 

Trouli et al, 2008 [33]

Good

Poor

Poor

 

Good

 

Fair

Fair

Chan et al, 2009 [74]

   

Poor

 

Poor

  

Martel et al, 2009 [77]

 

Poor

   

Fair

Poor

Fair

Telci et al, 2009 [36]

 

Fair

   

Poor

Poor

 

van der Velde et al, 2009 [57]

Fair

   

Fair

Poor

  

Young et al, 2009 [61]

 

Poor

Poor

    

Good

Andrade Ortega et al, 2010 [34]

Fair

Poor

Poor

 

Fair

Fair

 

Fair

Jorritsma et al, 2010 (NDI) [70]

 

Poor

 

Poor

    

Jorritsma et al, 2010 (NPDS) [70]

 

Poor

Poor

Poor

  

Fair

 

Salo et al, 2010 [37]

Excellent

Poor

  

Good

Poor

Poor

 

Wu et al, 2010 (NDI) [38]

Poor

Poor

   

Poor

Fair

 

Wu et al, 2010 (NPDS) [38]

Poor

Poor

  

Poor

Poor

Fair

 

Blozik et al, 2011 [72]

  

Poor

    

Poor

Chen et al, 2011 [68]

Good

Fair

  

Good

Poor

Fair

 

Odole et al, 2011 [35]

 

Fair

 

Poor

    

Ono et al, 2011 [71]

Fair

Fair

  

Fair

  

Poor

Pickering et al, 2011 (NDI) [55]

    

Fair

   

Pickering et al, 2011 (NPDS) [55]

    

Poor

   

Shakil et al, 2011 [39]

Poor

Fair

    

Fair

 

Uthaikhup et al, 2011 [40]

Good

Poor

Good

Poor

Good

Poor

Fair

 

Kesiktas et al, 2012 [41]

Fair

Fair

  

Fair

Fair

Fair

 

Jorritsma et al, 2012a [62]

Poor

  

Poor

 

Good

  

Jorritsma et al, 2012b [64]

       

Poor

Luksanapruksa et al, 2012 [42]

Poor

Fair

  

Poor

Poor

Poor

 

Monticone et al, 2012 [21]

Excellent

Fair

Good

Poor

Excellent

Good

Fair

 

Nakamaru et al, 2012 [43]

Poor

Fair

  

Fair

Poor

Fair

Poor

Soklic et al, 2012 [78]

Poor

Poor

Poor

  

Poor

Poor

 

Ailliet at al, 2013 [44]

   

Excellent

Fair

 

Good

 

Guzy et al, 2013 [45]

Fair

Fair

Fair

 

Fair

Poor

Poor

Poor

Johansen et al, 2013 [46]

    

Good

Poor

  

Shaheen et al, 2013 [47]

Poor

Fair

  

Fair

 

Fair

Poor

Walton & MacDermid, 2013 [58]

 

Fair

Fair

 

Fair

Poor

 

Poor

Cramer et al, 2014 [48]

Fair

Poor

  

Fair

Poor

 

Poor

Geri et al, 2014 [23]

Good

  

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Good

Johansen et al, 2014 [89]

Poor

Fair

Fair

    

Poor

Miekisiak et al, 2014 [83]

 

Good

Good

 

Excellent

Poor

  

Monticone et al, 2014 [22]

 

Good

Good

  

Good

Poor

Poor

Monticone et al, 2014 [84]

Excellent

Good

 

Poor

Excellent

Good

  

Swanenburg et al, 2014 [52]

Poor

Fair

Fair

 

Poor

Poor

Fair

 

Ailliet et al, 2015 [90]

 

Fair

Fair

    

Poor

Bakhtadze et al, 2015 [51]

Excellent

Good

Good

 

Excellent

Poor

Fair

 

Cruz et al, 2015 [49]

Good

Good

  

Good

Poor

Fair

 

Geri et al, 2015 [79]

Fair

   

Fair

   

Hung et al, 2015 [56]

    

Fair

   

Joseph et al, 2015 [50]

Poor

Fair

 

Fair

 

Poor

Fair

 

Monticone et al, 2015 [24]

       

Excellent

Pereira et al, 2015 [91]

  

Fair

    

Fair