Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Assessment of methodological quality of the included studies using the COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments checklist. Where the psychometric properties were not included in the studies, the boxes are left blanks

From: Patient-reported outcome measures for non-specific neck pain validated in the Italian-language: a systematic review

Authors, year Internal consistency Reliability Measurement error Content validity Structural validity Hypotheses testing Translation process Responsiveness
Hains et al, 1998 [53] Excellent     Good Good   
Stratford et al, 1999 [54] Fair Poor Poor   Poor Poor   Poor
Wheeler et al, 1999 [65] Poor    Poor Fair Fair   
Chok & Gomez, 2000 [26]   Poor       Poor
Ackelman & Lindgren, 2002 [27]   Poor   Poor   Poor   
Bolton & Humphreys, 2002 [76] Poor Poor Poor    Poor   
Goolkasian et al, 2002 [73]   Poor     Poor   
Wlodyka-Demaille et al, 2002 [28]   Poor    Fair Fair Poor  
Bicer et al, 2004 [69] Poor      Poor Poor  
Bolton, 2004 [80]         Poor
White et al, 2004 [81]   Fair   Poor   Fair   
Wlodyka-Demaille et al, 2004 [75]         Poor
Lee et al, 2006 [29] Poor Poor     Poor Poor Poor
Vos et al, 2006 [30]   Fair Fair      Poor
Gay et al, 2007 [59] Poor      Poor   Poor
Kose et al, 2007 [31] Poor Fair     Poor Poor Poor
Mousavi et al, 2007 (NDI) [32] Fair Fair   Poor    Poor  
Mousavi et al, 2007 (NPDS) [32] Fair Fair   Poor Fair   Poor  
Pool et al, 2007 [63]    Fair      Fair
Cleland et al, 2008 [60]   Fair Fair      Fair
Kovacs et al, 2008 [82] Poor Poor     Poor Poor Poor
Monticone et al, 2008 [20] Fair Fair    Fair Poor Poor  
Scherer et al, 2008 [67] Excellent     Good Good Poor  
Trouli et al, 2008 [33] Good Poor Poor   Good   Fair Fair
Chan et al, 2009 [74]     Poor   Poor   
Martel et al, 2009 [77]   Poor     Fair Poor Fair
Telci et al, 2009 [36]   Fair     Poor Poor  
van der Velde et al, 2009 [57] Fair     Fair Poor   
Young et al, 2009 [61]   Poor Poor      Good
Andrade Ortega et al, 2010 [34] Fair Poor Poor   Fair Fair   Fair
Jorritsma et al, 2010 (NDI) [70]   Poor   Poor     
Jorritsma et al, 2010 (NPDS) [70]   Poor Poor Poor    Fair  
Salo et al, 2010 [37] Excellent Poor    Good Poor Poor  
Wu et al, 2010 (NDI) [38] Poor Poor     Poor Fair  
Wu et al, 2010 (NPDS) [38] Poor Poor    Poor Poor Fair  
Blozik et al, 2011 [72]    Poor      Poor
Chen et al, 2011 [68] Good Fair    Good Poor Fair  
Odole et al, 2011 [35]   Fair   Poor     
Ono et al, 2011 [71] Fair Fair    Fair    Poor
Pickering et al, 2011 (NDI) [55]      Fair    
Pickering et al, 2011 (NPDS) [55]      Poor    
Shakil et al, 2011 [39] Poor Fair      Fair  
Uthaikhup et al, 2011 [40] Good Poor Good Poor Good Poor Fair  
Kesiktas et al, 2012 [41] Fair Fair    Fair Fair Fair  
Jorritsma et al, 2012a [62] Poor    Poor   Good   
Jorritsma et al, 2012b [64]         Poor
Luksanapruksa et al, 2012 [42] Poor Fair    Poor Poor Poor  
Monticone et al, 2012 [21] Excellent Fair Good Poor Excellent Good Fair  
Nakamaru et al, 2012 [43] Poor Fair    Fair Poor Fair Poor
Soklic et al, 2012 [78] Poor Poor Poor    Poor Poor  
Ailliet at al, 2013 [44]     Excellent Fair   Good  
Guzy et al, 2013 [45] Fair Fair Fair   Fair Poor Poor Poor
Johansen et al, 2013 [46]      Good Poor   
Shaheen et al, 2013 [47] Poor Fair    Fair   Fair Poor
Walton & MacDermid, 2013 [58]   Fair Fair   Fair Poor   Poor
Cramer et al, 2014 [48] Fair Poor    Fair Poor   Poor
Geri et al, 2014 [23] Good    Fair Good Good Good Good
Johansen et al, 2014 [89] Poor Fair Fair      Poor
Miekisiak et al, 2014 [83]   Good Good   Excellent Poor   
Monticone et al, 2014 [22]   Good Good    Good Poor Poor
Monticone et al, 2014 [84] Excellent Good   Poor Excellent Good   
Swanenburg et al, 2014 [52] Poor Fair Fair   Poor Poor Fair  
Ailliet et al, 2015 [90]   Fair Fair      Poor
Bakhtadze et al, 2015 [51] Excellent Good Good   Excellent Poor Fair  
Cruz et al, 2015 [49] Good Good    Good Poor Fair  
Geri et al, 2015 [79] Fair     Fair    
Hung et al, 2015 [56]      Fair    
Joseph et al, 2015 [50] Poor Fair   Fair   Poor Fair  
Monticone et al, 2015 [24]         Excellent
Pereira et al, 2015 [91]    Fair      Fair