Skip to main content

Table 2 Detailed analysis of video contents

From: Can YouTube be used as an educational tool in lymphedema rehabilitation?

 

n (%)

Reliability

GQS

Video type

 Information video for patients

52 (57.8)

2.1

2.6

 Education video for the healthcare  professional

24 (26.7)

3.0

3.5

 Lymphedema product commercial

14 (15.6)

1.2

1.8

p value

 

p < 0.001*

p < 0.001*

Uploader

 Private healthcare institution / professional

59 (65.6)

2.1

2.6

 University

16 (17.8)

2.5

3.5

 Hospital

10 (11.1)

2.8

2.7

 Lymphedema product manufacturer

5 (5.6)

1.2

2.0

 p value

 

0.007*

0.004*

Presenter

 Lymphedema therapist

57 (63.3)

2.3

2.9

 Massage therapist

13 (14.4)

1.8

2.5

 Physician

6 (6.7)

3.0

2.5

 Manufacturer representative

5 (5.6)

1.0

1.6

 Unknown

9 (10.0)

2.3

3.1

 p value

 

0.006*

0.023*

  1. Subgroup analyzes (Mann Whitney U analysis with Bonferoni correction)
  2. Video type
  3. Reliability and GQS scores = There were significant differences between all video type subgroups p < 0.001
  4. Uploder
  5. Reliability scores = Universities-Manufacturer representative p = 0.001
  6. GQS scores = Private healthcare providers-universities p = 0.001
  7. Presenter
  8. Reliability and GQS scores = lymphedema therapists- Manufacturer representative p = 0.001
  9. GQS Global quality score
  10. *Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance