Open Access

Hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation effects after increased in positive end-expiratory pressure in coronary artery bypass surgery

  • Vanessa Marques Ferreira Méndez1, 2,
  • Mayron F. Oliveira1, 3Email author,
  • Adriana do Nascimento Baião1, 2,
  • Patrícia Andrade Xavier1, 2, 4,
  • Carlos Gun5,
  • Priscila A. Sperandio1 and
  • Iracema I. K. Umeda1
Archives of Physiotherapy20177:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-016-0030-4

Received: 11 July 2016

Accepted: 21 December 2016

Published: 11 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Cardiac surgery is widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, several complications can be observed during the postoperative period. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves gas exchange, but it might be related to decreased cardiac output and possible impairment of tissue oxygenation. The aim of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects and oxygen saturation of central venous blood (ScvO2) after increasing PEEP in hypoxemic patients after coronary artery bypass (CAB) surgery.

Methods

Seventy post-cardiac surgery patients (CAB), 61 ± 7 years, without ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 57 ± 2%), with hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200) were enrolled. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, arterial and venous blood samples were measured at intensive care unit and PEEP was increased to 12 cmH2O for 30 min.

Results

As expected, PEEP12 improved arterial oxygenation and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.0001). Reduction in ScvO2 was observed between PEEP5 (63 ± 2%) and PEEP12 (57 ± 1%; p = 0.01) with higher values of blood lactate in PEEP12 (p < 0.01). No hemodynamic effects (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, SpO2; p > 0.05) were related.

Conclusion

Increased PEEP after cardiac surgery decreased ScvO2 and increased blood lactate, even with higher O2 delivery. PEEP did not interfere in hemodynamics status in CAB patients, suggesting that peripheral parameters must be controlled and measured during procedures involving increased PEEP in post-cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care unit.

Keywords

PEEP ScvO2 Cardiac surgery Hemodynamics Physiotherapy

Background

Coronary artery bypass (CAB) surgery is widely used in cardiovascular treatment and, during procedure, patients are exposed to anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. This exposure is one of the most important cause of pulmonary dysfunction in the postoperative period with higher levels of morbidities [1]. Moreover, anesthesia might be responsible for reduced pulmonary volume, atelectasis and reduced oxygenation [1].

In this scenario, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) has commonly been used to reverse atelectasis and hypoxemia [2]. However, PEEP could interfere in intra-thoracic pressure, which can reduce venous return and cardiac output [3], which in turn can affect tissue perfusion and delivery/utilization.

The influence of PEEP on cardiac output and tissue oxygenation can be measured by oxygen saturation of central venous blood (ScvO2) [3] and values under 70% suggest low oxygen delivery/utilization and are predictive of a poor prognosis during postoperative period [3]. However, there are few studies that evaluated the hemodynamic effects of PEEP and ScvO2 in patients after cardiac surgery (CAB). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate hemodynamic effects and tissue oxygenation measured by ScvO2 in two levels of PEEP in patients after CAB.

Methods

Post elective cardiac surgery patients (CAB), over 40 years, with hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200) and hemoglobin >10 g/dL were enrolled. Patients with hemodynamic instability (heart rate <50 bpm or >140 bpm), mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg or >140 mmHg, norepinephrine dosage >0.03 mcg/kg/min and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% were excluded.

After undergoing cardiovascular surgery, all of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and immediately arterial and central venous blood sample were collected and submitted for blood gas analysis (865(R) blood gas analyzer; Chiron Diagnostics, England). The catheter’s for venous blood sample was located at the right atrium and the correct position was checked accordingly to the institutional protocol. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and oxyhemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) were measured with a Dixtal monitor (DX 2010®); volemic status (water balance) was also monitored during surgery and into the protocol. All patients were admitted at ICU and followed the institutional mechanical ventilation protocol with volume-controlled (PEEP 5 cmH2O, respiratory rate 14 breaths per minute, FiO2 0.4, tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg) and PEEP was increased to 12 cmH2O for 30 min in all patients with arterial hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200) (Fig. 1). After 30 min, all variables were measured and the protocol was ended.
Fig. 1

Flowchart of input in the study. Figure notes: LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; HR = heart rate; MAP = mean arterial pressure; SpO2 = hemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry; ICU = intensive care unit; FiO2 = oxygen support

Study protocol was interrupted and PEEP was returned to 5 cmH2O if there was drop in SpO2 below than 90%, increased in FiO2, mean arterial pressure <70 mmHg or bleeding >200 mL. All subjects provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil (protocol number 3535).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS program (version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine normality of the data distribution. Categorical variables were presented in absolute frequencies and percentage values. Continuous variables of parametric distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and, when appropriated, median [minimum value; maximum value] for variables of non-parametric distribution. Paired T-test and Mann–Whitney were used for comparisons between conditions. For all the analyses the statistical significance was accepted when p < 0.05.

Results

One hundred and twenty one consecutive post elective cardiovascular surgery patients were enrolled in this study and none of the patients had pulmonary disease, heart failure or renal insufficiency prior to surgery; fifty-one patients were excluded (bypass complication; LVEF <0.4; pulmonary hypertension; bleeding; MAP <70 mmHg; vasopressor medication >0.03 mcg/kg/min; higher oxygen support – FiO2 > 0.4); afterwards seventy patients were included in the study (Fig. 1).

Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were a higher percentage of male patients (77%) (Table 1) and, during surgery procedure, 50 patients (71%) had positive volemic status, and it remained positive during the stay in the intensive care unit, at both PEEP 5 cmH2O (180 ± 82 mL) and PEEP 12 cmH2O (197 ± 78 mL) (p > 0.05). It should be noted that during the protocol all patients had 0.4 of oxygen support.
Table 1

Patient’s characteristics and surgical data in seventy patients after CAB surgery

Anthropometrics/Demographics

 Age, years

61 ± 7

 Weight, kg

73 ± 10

 Height, m

1.63 ± 0.11

 BMI, kg/m2

27 ± 4

 LVEF, %

57 ± 2

 EuroSCORE, median (min-max)

5 (3–9)

 ICU, days

2 ± 1

 Mechanical ventilation time, hrs

6 ± 2

 Hospital length of stay, days

7 ± 2

Main comorbidities

 Hypertension, n (%)

64 (91%)

 Dyslipidemia, n (%)

52 (74%)

 Diabetes, n (%)

40 (57%)

 Ex-smoker, n (%)

35 (50%)

Surgical data

 Partial thromboplastin time activated, s

19 ± 8

 Cardiopulmonary bypass time, min

107 ± 22

 Cross-clamp time, min

61 ± 17

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, EuroSCORE European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. Data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation, unless specified

As expected, 12 cmH2O of PEEP increased PaO2 and improved PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Table 2). Moreover, no differences in carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) were observed between the two interventions. On the other hand, increased PEEP significantly reduced tissue oxygenation observed by ScvO2 with higher values of blood lactate but without difference in MAP or in central venous pressure (Table 2).
Table 2

Hemodynamic and tissue oxygenation in seventy patients after CAB surgery

 

PEEP 5

PEEP 12

p-value

HR, bpm

97 ± 16

92 ± 14

0.02

SAP, mmHg

109 ± 13

122 ± 17

0.12

DAP, mmHg

77 ± 16

81 ± 12

0.58

MAP, mmHg

89 ± 15

93 ± 13

0.65

Double product

10593 ± 411

11214 ± 459

0.17

Central venous pressure, mmHg

7 ± 2

8 ± 3

0.96

SpO2, %

94 ± 3

96 ± 3

0.89

VT, mL

597 ± 121

613 ± 130

0.33

RR, ripm

14 ± 1

14 ± 2

0.99

Catecholamine

12 (17%)

15 (21%)

0.21

Blood sample

 Hb, g/dL

12 ± 1

12 ± 2

0.92

 pH

7.37 ± 0.07

7.35 ± 0.06

0.05

 PaO2, mmHg

70.2 ± 6.2

112.8 ± 2.1

<0.0001

 PaCO2, mmHg

38.6 ± 8.8

38.7 ± 7.8

0.96

 HCO3

22.1 ± 2.3

21.8 ± 1.6

0.03

 BE

−2.4 ± 0.8

−3.5 ± 0.6

0.04

 SaO2, %

93 ± 3

97 ± 2

0.02

 PaO2/FiO2 ratio

179 ± 24

271 ± 38

<0.0001

 ScvO2, %

63 ± 5

57 ± 3

0.01

 Lactate, mmol/L

3.2 ± 1.1

6.7 ± 1.5

0.001

Abbreviations: HR heart rate, bpm beats per minute, SAP systolic arterial pressure, DAP diastolic arterial pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, SpO 2 hemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry, V T tidal volume, RR respiratory rate, ripm respiratory incursion per minute, Hb hemoglobin, pH hydrogen potential, PaO 2 arterial oxygen pressure, PaCO 2 arterial carbon dioxide pressure, HCO 3 bicarbonate, BE base excess, SaO 2 arterial oxygen saturation, ScvO 2 oxygen saturation of central venous blood. Values are expressed in mean ± standard deviation or frequency

Most patients were discharged from the intensive care unit on the second day and with low mechanical ventilation time (Table 1). None of the patients included in the study experienced cardiac outcome or death after the protocol.

Discussion

In the present study we investigated the influence of PEEP on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation in patients after CAB. It should be noted that increases in PEEP caused a significant reduction in tissue oxygenation (ScvO2), even with higher levels of oxygen delivery (PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio).

Collapsed lung and hypoxia are common complications after cardiac surgery, mainly due to anesthesia (decreased muscle tone and predisposition to atelectasis) [4] and these changes may be accentuated by surfactant reduction and inflammatory response. In addition, the inflammatory process contributes to pulmonary interstitial edema, which cause a significant decrease in pulmonary gas exchange [5]. Our results indicate increases in PaO2, oxygen hemoglobin saturation, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio, suggesting a reversal of alveolar collapse. These results are consistent with those found in the scientific literature, mainly in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome [5]. Studies have shown that higher values of PEEP can prevent hypoxemia, with a significant increase in PaO2 in post-cardiac surgery patients [57].

Despite the benefits of high PEEP after cardiac surgery in improving oxygenation, some precautions should be taken with PEEP increases in patients at the intensive care unit, mainly because PEEP might interfere with intra-thoracic pressure with hemodynamic effects. Some studies have demonstrated that reductions in cardiac output and tissue oxygenation could occur after increased PEEP [4, 8]. Moreover, different PEEP levels reduced cardiac output without changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, ScvO2, or hemodynamic values (heart rate or mean arterial pressure). The authors suggested that the reduced cardiac output was due to high levels of PEEP, as cardiac output was restored after PEEP decreased to 5 cmH2O [8].

Studies of normovolemic patients have reported maintenance of cardiac output after increased PEEP [9]. However, it should be noted that our study exhibited positive water balance and higher values of blood lactate after study protocol, suggesting that increased PEEP values were responsible for reducing cardiac output and, consequently, for reductions in tissue oxygenation (lower ScvO2 values). Recently, Gutierrez (2016) [10] described a higher respiratory muscle workload with a decreased ScvO2 and this finding was not associated with sepsis. Furthermore, Rivers et. al. (2001) [11] demonstrated that increases in ScvO2 should have been related to respiratory muscles unloading by mechanical ventilation. Our study was not designed to access the respiratory muscle function (overloading or unloading) by PEEP increases, but this fact might have influenced the reduction in ScvO2 values. This issue should be performed in further studies with PEEP hemodynamics after CAB surgery. Moreover, some studies have demonstrated that higher levels of PEEP required more sedatives and increase the mechanical ventilation time and compromise the mechanical ventilation withdrawal [6, 12, 13]. Our data support the notion that high PEEP levels directly affect tissue oxygenation in patients after cardiac surgery, even with preserved cardiac function and without surgery complications. However, it should be noted that our protocol did not measure cardiac output directly and we suggest a reduction in cardiac output using ScvO2.

Moreover, some studies have reported that short periods of increased PEEP may be beneficial to post-cardiac surgery patients without compromising hemodynamic or tissue oxygenation [14]. In this scenario, even in short periods of high PEEP levels, certain precautions should be taken, such as ScvO2 measurements. Our results suggest a reduction in tissue oxygenation and higher levels of blood lactate during only 30 min of rising PEEP; and it has been demonstrated that reductions in ScvO2 are related to poor outcomes after cardiac surgery. The maintaining ScvO2 above 70% resulted in a reduction in mortality [15] and our findings support our suggestions that ScvO2 should be monitored in patients without cardiac failure or without surgery complications.

Study limitations

Some limitations of this study should be addressed. The inclusion criteria of PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 may have limited the number of patients in our study. Thus the extrapolation of our findings to other studies of CAB surgery should be viewed with caution. On the other hand, there is evidence that the PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 is the most common hypoxemia finding after CAB surgery [16] and PaO2 alterations in patients after CAB surgery do not depend on PEEP only but the level of O2 delivery/utilization ratio [11]. Moreover, we did not measure cardiac output before or after PEEP increase, which could have better demonstrated tissue oxygen delivery and utilization. Rather, ScvO2 values were used to reflect tissue oxygen delivery and utilization indirectly during the PEEP maneuver. The venous blood sample has been taken by a catheter positioned in right atrium, we recognize that this could rise some questions, but all patients had normal right ventriculum and with adequate volemic status and central venous pressure. Further studies with Swan-Ganz catheter should be performed to access the directly effect of hemodynamics repercussions with PEEP in hypoxemic CAB patients. We believe that ScvO2 is a good alternative to measure whole-body oxygen extraction, it is minimally invasive and have low cost. In addition, our results demonstrated positive water balance during the intensive care unit, but other measurements could also have been addressed, such as Swan-ganz catheter. Moreover, we did not measure the inflammation status after cardiac surgery or after PEEP maneuver.

Our study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamics effects after PEEP increases, and we recognize that a control group, without PEEP increases, was not performed; but the PEEP titration was not main objective of the study; we aimed to investigate hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation after a simple PEEP increase in hypoxemic patients after CAB. The choice of 12 cmH2O for the PEEP value was made because it is commonly used in intensive care units to reverse arterial hypoxemia [17]. Further studies for hemodynamics measurements and tissue perfusion with control group and with different groups of PEEP are necessary, both in CAB and other cardiac procedures.

Conclusion

In this study, increases in PEEP after CAB decreased ScvO2 and increased blood lactate, even with higher O2 delivery. In addition, PEEP increases did not interfere in hemodynamics status in CAB patients, suggesting that in addition to arterial blood gas analysis and hemodynamics measurements, peripheral parameters must be controlled and measured during procedures involving increased PEEP in post-cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care unit.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Authors’ contributions

VMFM, MFO, PAS, CG e IIKU conception design; VMFM, MFO, ANB e PAX data collect; VMFM, MFO, ANB, PAX, CG, PAS e IIKU data analysis and interpretation; ANB, PAX e PAS conception of tables and figur’es; VMFM, MFO ANB e PAX intellectual contribution; VMFM, MFO, ANB, PAX, CG, PAS e IIKU approved and revised the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that are no conflict of interest related to this article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil (protocol number 3535).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Physiotherapy Unit, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology
(2)
Physiotherapy Unit, Division of anesthesiology and intensive care unit – Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP)
(3)
Physiotherapy Unit, Division of Health Sciences Centre, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
(4)
Physiotherapist of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (HIAE)
(5)
Medical doctor of Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology – Division of Intensive Care Unit

References

  1. Duggan M, Kavanagh BP. Pulmonary atelectasis: A pathogenic perioperative entity. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:838–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Padovani C, Cavenaghi OM. Alveolar recruitment in patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26:116–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hartog C, Bloos F. Venous oxygen saturation. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:419–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox CM, Ascione R, Cohen AM, Davies IM, Ryder IG, Angelini GD. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on pulmonary gas exchange: A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:140–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Auler Jr JO, Carmona MJ, Barbas CV, Saldiva PH, Malbouisson LM. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory system mechanics and hemodynamics in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33:31–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lago Borges D, Jose da Silva Nina V, Pereira Baldez TE, De Albuquerque Goncalves Costa M, PereiradosSantos N, Mendes Lima I, LimadaSilvaLula J. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on mechanical ventilation duration after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20:773–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borges DL, Nina VJ, Costa Mde A, Baldez TE, Santos NP, Lima IM, Figuerêdo ED, Lula JL. Effects of different peep levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013;28:380–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Luecke T, Pelosi P. Clinical review: Positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output. Crit Care. 2005;9:607–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, Habet K, Zanotti S, Marshall S, Neumann A, Ali A, Cheang M, Kavinsky C, Parrillo JE. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutierrez G. Work of breathing, not dysoxia, as the cause of low central venous blood o2 saturation in sepsis. Crit Care. 2016;20:291.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. NEJM. 2001;345:1368–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dongelmans DA, Hemmes SN, Kudoga AC, Veelo DP, Binnekade JM, Schultz MJ. Positive end-expiratory pressure following coronary artery bypass grafting. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:790–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Michalopoulos A, Anthi A, Rellos K, Geroulanos S. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (peep) in cardiac surgery patients. Respir Med. 1998;92:858–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Malbouisson LM, Brito M, Carmona MJ, Auler JO. Hemodynamic impact of alveolar recruitment maneuver in patients evolving with cardiogenic shock in the immediate postoperative period of myocardial revascularization. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008;58:112–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Perz S, Uhlig T, Kohl M, Bredle DL, Reinhart K, Bauer M, Kortgen A. Low and “supranormal” central venous oxygen saturation and markers of tissue hypoxia in cardiac surgery patients: A prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:52–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Szeles TF, Yoshinaga EM, Alenca W, Brudniewski M, Ferreira FS, Auler JO, Carmona MJ, Malbouisson LM. Hypoxemia after myocardial revascularization: Analysis of risk factors. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008;58:124–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rouby JJ, Lu Q, Goldstein I. Selecting the right level of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1182–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement